Showing posts with label IBM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IBM. Show all posts

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Who Says Elephants Can't Dance


http://tinyurl.com/reviewIBMRevived
IBM Revived
How did Louis managed make IBM dance


Summary:

A book on IBM's historic turnaround. How Louis led this historic revival is what this book is all about. For ages IBM has been evolved into an IT behemoth, which the author Louis has pen named it as an ELEPHANT. It tells each ad everything what should be done with some don’ts too. Also he gives some management mantras which may be learned, understood and followed.


Detailed:

Say you have a habit of watching morning news. Imagine, one fine day, you wake up and switch ON the Television, to your surprise you get to see a BREAKING NEWS. The news is about TATA declaring bankruptcy. Not only for you but for the whole population of India, it will be shocking news. You will wonder, what unavoidable/uncontrollable circumstances might have occurred which led the company to these decision. Here comes the role of turning around a company from it entering to the so called "Grave". Also imagine what it would take to revive a company like TATA.

One of the biggest disadvantages in turnaround "The Making" is lots and lots of people have to give sacrifice. The direct effect of this sacrifice is reducing the number of employee. This is because to cut costs, which is the best way to start reviving a company, first step is always reduce the employee strength. Cost cutting is needed, because it’s impossible to make profits. Now this is not only because of these low - level employees. Always organization is a group effort. But to be precise it is the management failure that consumes the major chunk for the company failure. Still the employee cut outs are faced by lower level employees. This is just to reduce the number, not on the basis of talent. We can say this is a sacrifice by the people. This is what hurts me more, isn't there any way to avoid such kind of lay offs.'

See a book, is a book. It is men’s best friend. Reading a book always add to our knowledge. If not it at least improves our Language competency. So according to me the intended audience for the book is anybody. But if you really ask me, there are two category of audience

1 - People who had spent some amount of time in the industry, and have reached the top management positions

2 - People who are IT freaks, wannabe MBAs, for them it is quite an inspirational and motivational book.

For every organization, there comes a time for struggle. But what differentiates IBM is the level and the size of the company. People often think how such companies with great people are unable to survive. But when the company is this large, you sitting at the top do not even see the half of its structure. Here comes the role of good people. The main job of a CEO, which is very much analogous to a LEADER, is to hold all the people tightly.

Once we set a goal for the company, always we should set our vision/ vision statement first. Once the vision is decided, this ideology should be percolated in the entire company. People should work as if they are the only one, OR, say that they are running their own business. One should not forget, "SEA is made up of DROPS". But for all these the leader should him/herself implement the ideology. Management is all about managing people, as it is rightly said by APJ Abdul Kalam (current president of INDIA).

This book is nothing but a story of IBM redux. But the way it is written down is excellent. It is not written as a story. But it is written as it would be a case study or a text book for a subject. Lou being having a great corporate experience was the best candidate for the job, and he uncertainly fulfilled everybody's expectation.

The chapters are very well categorized and named under PARTS. Here he after summing up, precisely, the revival of IBM, without much detail, tells what lessons he himself have learned. Also described is what observations he have concluded from his journey, which is the best part of the book. Because we need not have to derive anything from the book, the author himself has given the points. This book proves that it’s the industry experience that matters more, than the technical know how. Also management is the life of a company. Lou was not at all from IT background, yet he succeeded.


The book is being carved up into 5 Parts:

First part GRABBING HOLD contains 11 chapters. It basically tells his initial time at IBM. How did he manage himself in a technology company? How did he understood the basic of business for this vertical? How did he make all those decisions?

Second
is STRATEGY. It has 8 chapters. He starts with giving a brief introduction for IBM. He tells how he changed the focus of IBM to services. Who all helped him to take this drastic change? Since software industry has already become huge in size, and IBM being the major contributor, its tough at times to change people's state of mind.

Third
is CULTURE. It has total of 3 chapters. I think this is the most important part of all. It is the culture that plays a stellar role. We always distinguish among people on their culture. We like to be with people of better and rich cultural background. Same thing goes for an organization. It is the culture, the vision that makes up a company. Also Lou suggests that the cultural development should be Inside-Out. Here inside-out means the nourishment of culture should not only be influenced from past internal experience, but also from past external change.

Fourth
part deals with LESSONS that Gurstner learned during his term of office. It has 4 chapters. Here I can bet that the lessons learned can be applied in a broader perspective for any industry. It is just the personal touch and experience that differs. If only you can decipher that, all people learn the same lessons again and again, even if they try to utilize someone else's experience. The main core reflects only one thing; we should not stick to same policies to run a business. The policies decided should be highly adaptive according to the marketable changes.


Last but not the least, it discusses about OBSERVATIONS about the industry. The industry, the system, the watchers etc...


Lou's work experience before IBM in that order:
McKinsey and Company: 9 years
American Express: 11 years
RJR Nabisco: 4 years
IBM

Some Excerpts:

01
. People do what you inspect, not what you expect.
02
. Getting it done, getting it done right, getting it done better than the next person is far more important than dreaming up new visions of the future.
03. If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.
04. In short, business with high-performance cultures are winners and no person of substance would work an.


--
trackback :
my blog
my profile
my microblog


Stumble Upon Toolbar Digg!

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Dell eyes plan to outsource and sell factories

Change is Constant- Welcome Contract Manufacturing.

Dell, the world’s second-biggest personal computer maker, is considering a plan to sell its factories, according to people familiar with the matter.

Dell declined to comment on the potential move, which was reported by the Wall Street Journal on Friday.

But two people familiar with the situation said Dell had approached so-called contract manufacturers – companies that make electronics equipment on behalf of name-brand groups – about taking over the plants.

“Dell hasn’t been as profitable as it would like to be, and owning its manufacturing is dragging it down,” said one observer, who declined to be named........

read more | digg story

--
trackback :
my blog
my profile
my microblog

Stumble Upon Toolbar Digg!

Sunday, June 29, 2008

Top 100 most powerful brand report

top 10 goes to:

01 - Google
02 - GE
03 - Microsoft
04 - Coca-Cola
05 - China Mobile
06 - IBM
07 - Apple
08 - McDonald's
09 - Nokia
10 - Malboro

The combined value of all brands in the BrandZ Top 100 increased by 21%, from $1.6 trillion in 2007 to $1.94 trillion in 2008, more than twice the increase experienced the previous year. Google tops the list again with a brand value of $86.1bn, followed by GE at $71.4bn, and Microsoft at $70.8bn. The biggest risers in the ranking include Apple at $30bn with the biggest dollar increase in the Top 100 list, and BlackBerry, that entered the BrandZ Ranking at number 51 thanks to a brand value increase of 390%.

"trying to make up some story with the brands: Using Microsoft XP on my IBM ThinkPad, searching on Google website, sitting in McDonals, using McDonald's Wifi, searching information on GE through Google, drinking coke(coca cola) from McDonald's, using IBM ThikPad, side by side listening to Apple's iPod, downloading iTunes from Apple's Website, and suddenly got a call on my Nokia mobile, what a coincidence, a person next to my table is smoking a Marlboro cigarette and using a China Mobile mobile phone"

" It means that these global brands have influence in our life and there penetration certainly make them a global brand"

Guys for the full report go to : MillwardBrown

Stumble Upon Toolbar Digg!